Transforming the Concept of Public Space and Its Impact on Space Experience in the City of Esfahan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Engineering,Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch.iran

2 Tarbiat Modares University

3 Department of َurban planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, honar University, Esfahan, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Design, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

5 Department of urban planning, Faculty of Engineering,Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch.iran

Abstract

Urban planning and new management practices have transformed the use of public spaces in many countries. However, disillusions and failure to provide local values highly affect the forms of these areas. This article considers the dynamism and user’s preferences of such spaces, studying the transformation of public spaces, new business centers and their impacts on the experience of space users. Esfahan is considered as a city with rapidly expanding economy, although public spaces thereof have largely failed to meet the people's requirements. This study seeks to answer the questions regarding the concepts of public spaces, criticisms on the emergence of public spaces, and their effects on the experience of the citizens. Accordingly, modernist and capitalist-inspired approaches have created meaningless and unfriendly spaces with no role in the experience of space users. Based on the literature review, and the in-depth interviews conducted in 4 urban spaces in Esfahan, this study considered the elements of space domination, space ownership, (with public and private boundaries), use of space and agency in space, and provided a proper understanding of the role of urban design in enhancing the collective experience of space users, which could help public spaces encounter various challenges. According to this study, a leading urban design approach is to be pursued, if the public spaces are to meet the requirements of the citizens and remain in the collective experience of users.

Keywords


  1. Banerjee, T. (2001)’the future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (1): 9-24.
  2. T. Banerjee, T and Loukaitou-Sideris, A.(1992)’ Private production of downtown public open space: Experience of Los Angeles and San Francisco’ Study of Urban and Regional Planning
  3. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006)’ Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology Journal, 3 (2): 77-101.
  4. Carmona, M. (2010a)’Contemporary Public Space: Part One, Critique’, Journal of Urban Design, 15 (1): 123–148.
  5. Carmona, M. (2010b)’Contemporary Public Space: Part Two, Classification’, Journal of Urban Design 15 (2): 157–173.
  6. Carmona, M. (2015)’ Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative’, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(4): 373-405
  7. Carmona, M. (2019)’Principles for public space design, planning to do better’, Urban Design International Journal, 24: 47-59.
  8. Creswell, J. and Garrett, A. (2008)’The ‘Movement’ of Mixed Methods Research and the Role of Educators’, South African Journal of Education, 28: 321–333.
  9. Gehl, J. and Svarre, B. (2013)’How to study public life’. Translated by Izadi, m. s, (In Persian).
  10. Gunder, M. (2011)’Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response ’Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31 (2): 184–195.
  11. Hubbard, P.(1996)’Urban Design and City Regeneration: Social Representations of Entrepreneurial
  12. Landscapes’, Urban Studies Journal 33 (8): 1441–1462.
  13. Jacobsen, M. and Chatterjee, H.(2001)’ The Fall of Public Place’ Aalborg Universitet’ Sociologisk Arbejdspapir
  14. Kirby, A. and Glavac, S.(2012)’ Privatised development and the quality of urban life Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers’, Urban Design and Planning Journal, 165 (3) : 167-175
  15. Lang, J.(2017)’The generic and the specific in urban design’, Journal of Urban Design, 22 (1): 39-41
  16. Lang, J. and Marshall, N.( 2016)’ Urban squares as places, Links and displays: Successes and failures’ Routledge: London and New York 
  17. Lee, Y. and Bichard, J (2008)’ Teen-Scape: Designing Participations for the Design Excluded’ Conference Paper, In PDC Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 128–137. Indianapolis: Indiana University
  18. Madanipour, A. (2003)’Public and Private Spaces of the City’ Translated by Norian, F. (In Persian).
  19. Madanipour, A. (2014)’ Urban Design: Space and society’ Translated by Aminzade,b and Rezabeigi,R. (In Persian).
  20. Madanipour, A. (2019)’Rethinking public space: between rhetoric and reality’ Urban Design International Journal, 24:38–46.
  21. Mandeli, Kh. (2019)’ Public space and the challenge of urban transformation in cities of emerging economies: Jeddah case study’ Cities Journal, 95.
  22. Manfredini, M. (2017)’ The Augmented Meta-Public Space, Interpreting emerging transductive territories in enhanced centres of consumption’ The Journal of Public Space, 2 (3).
  23. Mehaffy, M.W and Elmlund, M. and Farrell, K. (2019)’Implementing the new urban agenda: The central role of public space’ Urban Design International Journal, 24 (1):4-6.
  24. Mohammadpour, A. (2013:2). Qualitative research method’ counter method 2’tehran’ jameeshenasan Publications. . (In Persian).
  25.  Nas, P. (2012) ‘the Urban Anthropologist as ‘Flâneur’: The Symbolic Pattern of Indonesian Cities’ Wakana Journal, 14(2) :429-454.