Identification of Building Façade Functions by Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Technique

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

3 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Housing is viewed as a collection of characteristics that are used to satisfy goals, such as comfort and visual quality. Identifying the most important functions of façadefaçade, results in improving quality. In this regard, the façade plays a crucial role in creating the borders of inner space in contact with its surroundings and can be considered as an interface. This study aimed to investigate and rank the most prominent functions of the façade in relation to the inside and outside of a home as a connector and barrier and find out the differences between the importances of façade functions of different indoor spaces of a home. The parameters were extracted through a theoretical study for the previous related studies, the functions of the façade were first investigated and categorized and then data was collected by using questionnaires completed by experts of housing design. The Delphi technique was used in this regard. In order to rankof the functions of a façade façaderegarding different interior spaces of the home, fuzzy TOPSIS technique, one of the approaches adopted in (MCDM), was used. Findings revealed that the key functions of the façade were sufficient daylight and good visual access for living room, control of natural ventilation and air flow for kitchen, privacy for the master bedroom and prevention of noise pollution and management of climate and natural disturbances for children bedroom. It also indicated that making connections with the outer space in the living room, kitchen, and hall are more important, however, in parents and children bedrooms, separation is significantly important.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmadi, F. (2012). Connection and Separation in Iranian Traditional Architecture. Kimiya-ye-Honar 3(1): 131-135 (In Persian).   
  2. Aksamija, A. (2009). Context Based Design of Double Skin Façades. Perkins+ Will Research Journal 1(1): 54-69.
  3. Aksamija, A. (2016). Design Methods for Sustainable, High-Performance Building Façades. Advances in Building Energy Research 10(2): 240–262.
  4. Arnheim, R. (1978). The Dynamics of Architectural Form. Oakland: University of California Press.
  5. Arnheim, R., Zucker, W. M. and Watterson, J. (1966). Inside and Outside in Architecture: A Symposium. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25(1): 3-15.
  6. Badarnah, L. (2017). Form Follows Environment: Biomimetic Approaches to Building Envelope Design for Environmental Adaptation. Buildings 7(2): 40-55.
  7. Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114(1): 1-9.  
  8. Cilliers, J. (2016). A Space for Grace: Towards an Aesthetics of Preaching. Stellenbosch: AFRICAN SUN MeDIA.
  9. Conrad, U. (Ed.) (1971). Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, Trans. Michael Bullock. Cambridge. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 
  10. Damyar, S. and Nari Ghomi, M. (2013). The Comparative Study of the Space Concept in the Vernacular Architecture and Modern Architecture. Honar–ha–ye–Ziba-Memari-Va-Shahrsazi 17(1): 65-72 (In Persian).   
  11. Dehkhoda, A. (1931). Dehkhoda Encyclopedia. Tehran: Tehran University Press (In Persian).
  12. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2018). Evaluating Place Quality in Innovation Districts: A Delphic Hierarchy Process Approach. Land Use Policy (76): 471-486.
  13. Fazeli, N., Mahdavinejad, M., & Bemaniyan, M. R. (2019). Dynamic Envelope and Control Shading Pattern for Office Buildings Visual Comfort in Tehran. Space Ontology International Journal, 8(3), 31-40
  14. Frampton, K. and Cava, J. (Ed.). (1995). Studies in Tectonic Culture: The Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 
  15. Gob, R., McCollin, C. and Ramalhoto, M. F. (2007). Ordinal Methodology in the Analysis of Likert Scales. Quality and Quantity 41(5): 601–626.
  16. Goli, D. (2013). Group fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology in Computer Security Software Selection. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems 3(2): 29-48.  
  17. Grutter, J. K. (2010). Aesthetics in Architecture, Trans. Mojtaba Dolatakhah, Solmaz Hemmati. Tehran: Hadafmand Publication.
  18. Haeri Mazandarani, M. R. (2010). Home, Culture, Nature. Tehran: Center for Urban Studies and Architecture of Iran (In Persian).
  19. Hashemi, S.R. (2016). The Philosophy of Façade: A Conference in USA, A Dialogue in Iran. Memar-magazine 96(1): 92-93 (In Persian).
  20. Heusler, W., & Kadija, K. (2018). Advanced Design of Complex Façades. Intelligent Buildings International 10(4):220–233.
  21. Hosseini, S. M., Mohammadi, M., Rosemann, A., Schröder, T., & Lichtenberg, J. (2019). A Morphological Approach for Kinetic Façade Design Process to Improve Visual and Thermal Comfort: Review. Building and Environment (153): 186–204.
  22. Jencks, C. & Kropf, K. (1997). Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture.  Chichester: Academy Press.
  23. Jurgenhake, B. (2006). Connecting Inside and Outside in Time-Based Dwelling. Nordic journal of Architectural Research 19(3): 59-68.
  24. Kim, M. (2015). The Matters of the Continuity in Architecture. GSTF Journal of Engineering Technology (JET) 3(3): 77-84. 
  25. Krier, R. (1988). Elements of Architecture. London: AD publications.
  26. Kurokawa, k. (1994). The Philosophy of Symbiosis (2nd Ed.). Chichester: Academy Pr.
  27. Le Corbusier. (1975). Manière de Penser l'urbanisme: Urbanisme des CIAM (Manner of Thinking Town Planning), Trans: Mohammad Taghi Katebi. Tehran: Amirkabir (In Persian).
  28. Lee, I. & Tiong, R.  (2007). Examining the Role of Building Envelopes Towards Achieving Sustainable Buildings. In: Horner, M., Hardcastle, C., Price, A., Bebbington, J. (Eds), International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and Its Assessment.
  29. Leung, T. M., Chau, C. K., Lee, W. L. and Yik, F. W. H. (2005). Willingness to Pay for Improved Environmental Performance of the Building Envelope of Office Buildings in Hong Kong. Indoor and Built Environment, 14(2): 147–156.
  30. Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the Future: Have You Considered Using the Delphi Methodology? Journal of Extension 35(5): 1-4.
  31. Mahboobi, G., Mokhtabad amreie, S. M., Etesam, I., & Attarabbasi, M. (2018). Symbiosis of Inside and Outside in Architecture of the Naqsh-e Jahan Square. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh- E Nazar 15(58):51–64.
  32. McFarquar, D. (2012). The Role of the Building Façade - Curtain Walls. Building Enclosure Science & Technology (BEST3) Conference. 
  33. Moore, C., Allen, G. and Lyndon, D. (2000). The Place of House. Oakland: University of California Press.
  34. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). Existence, Space and Architecture. Greenwood: Praeger Publishers.
  35. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1993). The Concept of Dwelling: On the Way to Figurative Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
  36. Norouzian-Maleki, S., Bell, S., Hosseini, S. B., & Faizi, M. (2015). Developing and Testing a Framework for the Assessment of Neighborhood Liveability in Two Contrasting Countries: Iran and Estonia. Ecological Indicators (48): 263-271.
  37. Pakzad, j. (2003). Phenomenology of Residential Buildings Façade and Evolution of Its Expectations. Honar–ha–ye–Ziba-Memari-Va-Shahrsazi 14(14): 51-62 (In Persian).
  38. Parsa, M. A. (2011). The Origin of Window Architecture an Inquiry in the Concept of Window in Persian Language and Culture. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment 30(134): 75-94 (In Persian).
  39. Pirnia, M.K. (2004). The Stylistics of Iranian Architecture. Tehran: Soroush-e-Danesh Publication (In Persian).
  40. Pourdeihimi, S. and Haji Seyyed Javadi, F. (2008). Daylight and the Human Being: Perception and Biopsychology of Daylight. Soffeh 17(46): 67-75 (In Persian).
  41. Porter, T. (2004). Archispeak: An Illustrated Guide to Architectural Terms. Abingdon: Routledge.
  42. Rapaport, A. (1969). House Form and Culture (Foundations of Cultural Geography Series). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 
  43. Sedigh Ziabari, S. H., Zolfagharzadeh, H., Asadi Malek Jahan, F., & Salavatian, S. M. (2019). Comparative Study on the Influence of Window to Wall Ratio on Energy Consumption and Ventilation Performance in Office Building of Temperate Humid Climate: A Case Study in Rash. Space Ontology International Journal, 8(2), 33-42
  44. Shahlaei, A. & Mohajeri, M. (2015). In-Between Space, Dialectic of Inside and Outside in Architecture. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development 5(3): 73-80.
  45. Shidfar, Sh. (2013). The Difference between Dwelling and Home in Architecture. International Journal of Computer Science 10(4): 239-243.
  46. Skinner, P. R. (2003). Reflections on Inside-Outside Space, In Design+ Research: Project Based Research in Architecture. 2nd International Conference of the Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia. 1-11.
  47. Tavassoli, M. (1997). Principles and Techniques of Urban Design and Residential Spaces in Iran. Tehran: Center for Urban Studies and Architecture of Iran (In Persian).
  48. Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture (2nd Ed.). New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
  49. Von Meiss, P. (1990). Elements of Architecture: From Form to Place. Abingdon: Routledge.
  50. Wang, T. C. and Lee, H. D. (2009). Developing a Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach Based on Subjective Weights and Objective Weights. Expert Systems with Applications 36(5): 8980–8985.
  51. Yang, T. and Hung, C. C. (2007). Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Methods for Plant Layout Design Problem. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23(1): 126-137.
  52. Yeang, K. (1994). Bioclimatic Skyscrapers. New York: Rizzoli International Publication.
  53. Young, S. J. and Jamieson, L. M. (2001). Delivery Methodology of the Delphi: A Comparison of Two Approaches. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration 19(1): 42-58.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics