From Rationalism Toward Humanity: Review of Notions Evolution in Urban Planning

Document Type : Original Article


Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


By this time, there has been a trend in the direction of devolvement in governance and planning. This trend presents a role for inhabitants, a considerable lot of whom have found an opportunity to express their interests for self-assurance; struggling that current governance structures do not satisfactorily outfit their needs and interests. As planning is inseparably connected to power, this feature definitely helps encouraging or limiting the advancement of which governance shapes. In this manner, the heading of planning practice warrants genuine thought about power, policy and people. This paper disposes the historical positions of planning, in perspective of deciding how the discipline develops and influences by rationalities. The investigation follows the paradigmatic advancement of the discipline to review the regular planning speculations. Eminent perspectives are then investigated and lined up beside transformative planning theories with focus on social approach development. Finally, the study of transitions in both areas of paradigm and rationality, indicates that viewpoints are changing fast from rationalism toward value based humane normative approaches, quantity to quality, and determinism to intuition.


  1. Albrecht, J. (1968). Development, context, and purpose of planning. Journal of School of Architecture, University of Illinois.
  2. Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environ Plann B 31:743–758.
  3. Armstrong, T. (1978). Ethical Problems of Northern Development. Polar Record19 (118):3-9.
  4. Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen partizipation. JAIP 35:216–224.
  5. Bahrainy, H.; Bakhtiar, A. (2016). Toward an Integrative Theory of Urban Design. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
  6. Berger, Thomas R. (1985). Village Journey. New York: Hill & Wang.
  7. Bommel, P. (2004). Transformation of knowledge, information and data: theory and applications. Information Science Publishing, Hershey.
  8. Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  9. Bryson, J.M.; Quick, K.S.; Slotterback, C.S.; Crosby, B.C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Adm Rev 73:23–34.
  10. Camhis, M. (1979). Planning Theory and Philosophy. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
  11. Cerreta, M.; Concilio, G.; Monno, V. (eds). (2010) .Making strategies in spatial planning: knowledges and values, urban and landscape perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht/ Heidelberg/London/New York.
  12. Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. J Am Inst Plann 31:331–338.
  13. Davidoff, P.; Reiner, T. (2012). A Choice Theory of Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. Issue 28:2, PP. 103-115.
  14. Elias, P.D. (1995). (Ed). Northern Aboriginal Communities: Economies and Development. Captus Press: North York, Ontario.
  15. Etzioni, A. (1967). Mixed scanning: A “third” approach to decision-making. Public Adm Rev27:385–392.
  16. Fagence, M. (1977). Citizen participation in planning. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  17. Fainstein, S.S.; Campbell, S. (eds). (2012). Readings in planning theory, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden.
  18. Flyvbjerg, B. (1996). The dark side of planning: rationality and “Realrationalitat”. In: Mandelbaum.
  19. Friedmann, J. (1979). The Good Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  20. Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  21. Galloway, Thomas D.; Mahayni, Riad G. (1977). Planning Theory in Retrospect: The Process of Paradigm Change. American Institute of Planners Journal 43(1):62-71.
  22. Garcia, Raul B. (1993). Changing Paradigms of Professional Practice, Education, and Research in Academe: A History of Planning Education in the United States. Michigan: U.M.I Dissertation Services, a Bell & Howell Information Company.
  23. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main.
  24. Hall, P. (2002) .Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford/Malden.
  25. Harris, N. (2005). Collaborative planning: from theoretical foundations to practice forms. In: Allmendinger P, Tewdwr-Jones M (eds) Planning futures: new directions for planning theory. Routledge, London, pp 21–43.
  26. Hayek, FA. (1967). Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Simon and Schuster,
  27. Hazlett, S.; McAdam, R.; Gallagher, S. (2005). Theory Building in Knowledge Management In Search of Paradigms. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 14 No. 1, March 2005 31-42.
  28. Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. Town Plan Rev 62:143–162.
  29. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  30. Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge, London.
  31. Healey, P. (2010). Making better places: the planning project in the twenty-first century. Palgrave McMillan, New York.
  32. Heyl, John D. (1975). Paradigms in Social Science. Society: Social Science and Modern Society 12(4):61-7.
  33. Hillier, J. (2011). Strategic navigation across multiple planes: towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Plan Rev 82:503–527.
  34. Hooghe, L.; Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration, Governance in Europe. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham.
  35. Howlett, M. (1994). Policy Paradigms and Policy Change: Lessons from the Old and New Canadian Policies Towards Aboriginal Peoples. Policy Studies Journal 22(4):631-49.
  36. Innes, J. (1995). Planning Theory Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14(3):183-89.
  37. Innes, J.; Booher, D.E. (1999) .Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. J Am Plan Assoc 65:412–423.
  38. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York.
  39. Jouve, B.; Lefe`vre, C. (2003). Local power, territory and institutions in European Metropolitan areas, The Cass Series in Regional and Federal Studies. Frank Cass Publishers, London.
  40. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  41. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Adm Rev 19:79.
  42. Lindblom, C. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Adm Rev 39:517–526.
  43. Lonner, T.D. (1986). Subsistence as an Economic System in Alaska: Theoretical Observations and Management Implications. In: Contemporary Alaskan Native
  44. Malekpour, S.; Brown, RR; Haan, F.J. (2015). Strategic planning of urban infrastructure for environmental sustainability: understanding the past to intervene for the future. Cities 46:67–75.
  45. Mannheim, K. (1951). Freedom, power and democratic planning. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
  46. Meadowcroft, J. (2009) .What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci 42:323–340.
  47. Moroni, S. (2001). ‘Planning, Evaluation and the Public Interest’. Paper presented at the International Seminar in Honour of Nathaniel Lichfield. London, 16–17 February.
  48. Moroni, S. (2004). Towards a Reconstruction of the Public Interest Criterion. Journal of Planning Theory. Vol 3(2): 151–171
  49. Myers, H.; Scott, F. (2000). Making Change: Economic Development in Pond Inlet, 1987 to 1997. Arctic 53(2):134-45. New York.
  50. Newman, P.; Thornley, A. (2011). Planning world cities: globalization and urban politics, planning, environment, cities, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  51. Nilson. E. (2004). Emergent Paradigms and Experiential Perspectives. Winnipeg.
  52. Page, R. (1986). Northern Development: The Canadian Dilemma. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
  53. Pieterse, Jan N. (1998). My Paradigm or Yours? Alternative Development, PostDevelopment, Reflexive Development. Development and Change 29(2):343-73.
  54. Polsby, N.W. (1984). Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  55. Rees, William E. (1987). Politics, Power, and Northern Land-Use Planning. In: Developing America's Northern Frontier. Theodore Lane (Ed). Lanham: University Press of America: 109-29.
  56. Roberts, Lisa J. (2000). Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 57(1):59-76.
  57. Robertson, I. (1999). A Northern Planner's Perspective: One Opinion. Plan Canada 39(3):20-3.
  58. Rosenhead, J. (1980). Planning under uncertainty: The inflexibility of methodologies. J Oper Res Soc 31:209.
  59. Ross, D.P.; Usher, P. (1986). From the Roots Up: Economic Development as if Community Mattered. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company.
  60. Sager, T. (2001). Planning style and agency properties. Environ Plan A 33:509–532.
  61. Salet, W.G.M; Faludi, A. (eds). (2000). The revival of strategic spatial planning. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam.
  62. Schmidt, Glen G. (2000). Remote, Northern Communities: Implications for Social Work Practice. International Social Work. 43(3):337-49.
  63. Simmie, J. (1974). Citizens in Conflict: The Sociology of Town Planning. London: Hutchinson.
  64. Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Free Press, New York.
  65. Taylor, N. (1998). Urban Planning Theory since 1945. London: Sage Publications.
  66. Usher, P.J. (1982). The North: Metropolitan Frontier, Native Homeland? In: Heartland and Hinterland. L.D. McCann (Ed). Scarborough: Prentice-Hall Canada.
  67. Weiss, A.; Woodhouse, E. (1992). Reframing incrementalism: a constructive response to the critics. Policy Sci 25:255–273.
  68. Wismer, S. (1996). The Nasty Game: How Environmental Assessment is Failing Aboriginal Communities in Canada's North. Alternatives. 22(4):10-17.
  69. Wolfram, M. (2018). Co-creating Sustainable Urban Futures: A Primer on Applying Transition. Edited by Niki Frantzeskaki, Katharina Hölscher, Matthew Bach, Flor Avelino. Springer Pub.
  70. Young, E. (1995). Third World in the First: Development and Indigenous Peoples. London: Routledge.