Explaining a Conceptual Model for Sustainable Regeneration of the River Valleys of the City of Tehran (Case study: Darakeh River Valley in Tehran)

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Pِh.D Candidate, Department of urban planning, Faculty of Engineering,Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch.iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of urban planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

4 Associate Professor of Urban Planning, Faculty of Environment , University of Tehran, Tehran , Iran.

Abstract

The issues of loss of quality of life and functional disruption of the river valleys are very important. In the present settlement system, the river valleys should not be places for reproducing poverty. To link the environmental values with urban development, the research is to answer the following question: How can the results of the integrated development of urban valleys be achieved via urban planning? In this study, river valleys, as the case study, were divided into four zones. Then, using the VIKOR method, these zones were ranked. After that, according to the relevant index, it was confirmed that the approaches adopted in the context of the reconstruction and organization of river valleys have failed to create a stable place. Sustainable urban regeneration, comprehensive and preventive approach and action for resolving urban problems of the target area of operations, and components of an integrated conservative development approach is replaced by some purely developmental and stereotypical measures. The conceptual model of sustainable urban regeneration resulting from the theoretical and responding questions to the research question as a step forward with the goal of optimal management and policy making in the valleys are explained and suggested to enhance the quality of these sensitive areas as the natural and exclusive wealth of cities such as Tehran Metropolis.

Keywords


  1. Albu L.L. (2006), Analysis of very long-term sustainability factors, National Institute of Economic Research; Retrieved 12 march 2013, from: http://www.ince.ro/IPE-2006-site.pdf;and town centre management. Local Economy, 20(2), 183–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13575270500053282.
  2. Alpopi, C., & Manole, C. (2013). Integrated urban regeneration–solution for cities revitalize. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 178-185.
  3. Asgharpour, Javad(2017), Multicriteria Decisions, University of Tehran, Publishing & Printing Institute. (In persian)
  4. Bithas, K. P., & Christofakis, M. (2006). Environmentally sustainable cities. Critical review and operational conditions. Sustainable Development, 14(3), 177-189.
  5. Book, K., Eskilsson, L., & Khan, J. (2010). Governing the balance between sustainability and competitiveness in urban planning: the case of the Orestad model. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(6), 382-396.
  6. Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30-48.
  7. Brook restoration in an urban surrounding of Hamburg - Forelle 2010 (Trout 2010) The project aims to re-establish “the typical local trout brook & quote; in an urban area.,
  8. Bryant, M. M. (2006). Urban landscape conservation and the role of ecological greenways at local and metropolitan scales. Landscape and urban planning, 76(1-4), 23-44.
  9. Burton, E., Jenks, M., & Williams, K. (2013). Achieving sustainable urban form. Routledge.
  10. Dos Santos, B. M., Godoy, L. P., & Campos, L. M. S. (2018). Performance Evaluation of Green Suppliers using Entropy-TOPSIS-F. Journal of Cleaner Production.
  11. Dickinson, S. (2005). Urban Regeneration in an Era of Well-being. Local Economy, 20(2), 224-229.
  12. Hafezalkotob, A., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2015a). Comprehensive MULTIMOORA method with target-based attributes and integrated significant coefficients for materials selection in biomedical applications. Materials and Design, 87, 949–959
  13. Heinonen, J., Kyrö, R., & Junnila, S. (2011). Dense downtown living more carbon intense due to higher consumption: a case study of Helsinki. Environmental Research Letters, 6(3), 034034.
  14. Huston, S., Rahimzad, R., & Parsa, A. (2015). ‘Smart’sustainable urban regeneration: Institutions, quality and financial innovation. Cities, 48, 66-75.
  15. Govindan, K., Loisi, R. V., & Roma, R. (2016). Greenways for rural sustainable development: an integration between geographic information systems and group analytic hierarchy process. Land use policy, 50, 429-440.
  16. Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. science, 319(5864), 756-760.
  17. Holden, E., & Norland, I. T. (2005). Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo region. Urban studies, 42(12), 2145-2166.
  18. Hong, W., Guo, R., Su, M., Tang, H., Chen, L., & Hu, W. (2017). Sensitivity evaluation and land-use control of urban ecological corridors: A case study of Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy, 62, 316-325.
  19. Izadi, Mohammad Saeed and Mahshid Sahizadeh (2004), Urban Conservation and Development: Two Complementary or Opposite Approaches, Abadi Magazine, No. 45. (In persian)
  20. Jones, K. B., Zurlini, G., Kienast, F., Petrosillo, I., Edwards, T., Wade, T. G., ... & Zaccarelli, N. (2013). Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1175-1192.
  21. Jongman, R. H., & Kamphorst, D. (2002). Ecological corridors in land use planning and development policies: national approaches for ecological corridors of countries implementing the Pan-European landscape and biological diversity strategy (No. 18-125). Council of Europe.
  22. Krueger, R., & Buckingham, S. (2012). Towards a ‘consensual’urban politics? Creative planning, urban sustainability and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 486-503.
  23. Lew, A. A. (2007). Invited commentary: Tourism planning and traditional urban planning theory—the planner as an agent of social change. Leisure/Loisir, 31(2), 383-391.
  24. Liu, Y., Song, Y., & Arp, H. P. (2012). Examination of the relationship between urban form and urban eco-efficiency in China. Habitat International, 36(1), 171-177.
  25. Lotfi, Sahand, (2012), Genealogy of Urban Recreation from Reconstruction to Renaissance, Azarakhsh Publications. (In persian).
  26. Lu, P., Z, You, Wang, L., |(2013). Study on planning control of urban ecologically sensitive area – Taking Nantong as an example. Resour. Dev. Mark. 29 (12),1315–1318 (in Chinese).
  27. Mardani Abbas, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Kannan Govindan, Aslan Amat Senin and Ahmad Jusoh (2016), VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications, Sustainability, 8, 37
  28. Musakwa, W., & Van Niekerk, A. (2013). Implications of land use change for the sustainability of urban areas: A case study of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Cities, 32, 143-156.
  29. Govindan, K., Loisi, R. V., & Roma, R. (2016). Greenways for rural sustainable development: an integration between geographic information systems and group analytic hierarchy process. Land use policy, 50, 429-440.
  30. Parhizkar, Mohammad Mehdi, Ali Akbar Aghajani Afroozi (2011),, Advanced Research Methodology in Applied Approach Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran. (In persian).
  31. Ramiadantsoa, T., Ovaskainen, O., Rybicki, J., & Hanski, I. (2015). Large-scale habitat corridors for biodiversity conservation: A forest corridor in Madagascar. PloSone, 10(7), e0132126.
  32. Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable—and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental impact assessment review, 16(4-6), 223-248.
  33. Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. Urban regeneration, 9-36.
  34. Sustainable Regeneration concept (2017), http:// udrc.ir
  35. Tan, P. Y., Wang, J., & Sia, A. (2013). Perspectives on five decades of the urban greening of Singapore. Cities, 32, 24-32.
  36. Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Moore, K. (2005). The results of making a city more compact: neighbours' interpretation of urban infill. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 32(5), 715-733.
  37. Warnaby, G., Bennison, D., & Davies, B. J. (2005). Marketing town centres: retailing and town centre management. Local Economy, 20(2), 183-204.
  38. Yan, L., Xu, X. G., Xie, Z. L., & Li, H. L. (2009). Integrated assessment on ecological sensitivity for Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(6), 3117-3125.
  39. Zhang, X., Skitmore, M., De Jong, M., Huisingh, D., & Gray, M. (2015). Regenerative sustainability for the built environment–from vision to reality: an introductory chapter. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 1-10.