Enhancing Social Interaction in Residential Complexes Case Study: Esfahan

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate in Architecture, Department of Design, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA

2 Assistant Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Yazd, IRAN.

Abstract

Considering vicinity as a mere prerequisite but not an ample cause needed for creation of a relationship, the paper investigates the interfering factors playing a significant role in social life of residential complexes habitats.Data for survey were collected through dividing the residential complexes in two groups of homogeneous and heterogeneous. In this way, we selected four residential complex in Esfahan, using a site-based questionnaire originated from the literature reviewed. As a result, social interaction among residents was measured and significant factors influencing this quality were studied and evaluated. Before which an open interview was conducted with residents and scholars in order to specify the hypothesis of the survey.The results of this study led to the following conclusions. Existence of a base for triple activities supports and facilitates social interaction among residents the most. Prompting a sense of place attachment, privacy and safety consequently correlate with social interaction as an independent factor. After all, social homogeneity has been recognized an influential ground factor.

Keywords


  1. Altman, I. & Low, Se. (1992).Place Attachment'. New York: Plenum Press.
  2. Altman, I.(2003).The environment and social behavior:privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Namazian, A. (Translator).Tehran: Shahid beheshti University.(In persian)
  3. Bonaiuto, M. Aiello, A. Perugini, M. Bonnes, M. Ercolani,A.P.(1999).Multidimentioanl Perception of Residential Environment Quality and Neighbourhood Attachment in the Urban Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19: 331-352.
  4. Chermayeff, S. & Alexander, Ch. (1992). Community and Privacy: Toward a New Architecture of Humanism, Mozayeni .M. (Translator). Tehran: Tehran University. (In persian).
  5. Forrest, R., Grange, A., Yip, N. M. (2002). Neighbourhood in a high rise, high density city: some observations on contemporary Hong Kong. The Sociological Review, 50(2), 215-240.
  6. Einifar, A. R. (2000).Human factors - An effective environment in the design of residential complexes, Honarhaie Ziba, 8 (0), 109-118. (In persian)
  7. Fergus, J.(2000).Psychology of social interaction, interpersonal behavior, Firuzbakht,M.& Beige, Kh. (Translators). Tehran: mahd. (In persian)
  8. Gehl, J.(1987).Life between Buildings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinbold.
  9. Ginsberg, Y. & Churchman, A. (1985).The Pattern and Meaning of Neighbourhood Relations in High-Rise Housing. Human Ecology, 13(4), 467-84.
  10. Ghasemi, v.(2010). Modeling the Structural Equation in Social Research Using AmosGraphic. Tehran: Publications Sociologists. (In persian).
  11. Ghasemi Esfahani, M. (2004). Where are we from?. Tehran: Rozane.(in Persian)
  12. Green, R. (1999).Meaning and Form in Community Perception of Town Character. New York: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4): 311-329.
  13. Ghazizadeh, N. (2011). Effect of landscape design of residential complex in creating sense of attachment to location. University of Tehran: Abstract of PhD thesis.(In persian)
  14. Giddens, A. (1994).Sociology. Saboury, M. (translator), first edition.Tehran: Nei
  15. Jephcott, P.& Robinson, H. (1971).Homes in High Flats. Some of the human problems involved in multi-storey housing. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 101-106.
  16. Lang, J. (2007). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design, Behzadfar, M. (translator). Tehran: University of Tehran, Entesharat va Chap Institute.
  17. Madanipour, A. (2008) Public and Private Spaces of the City, Norian, F. (translator). Tehran: Sherkat Pardazesh va Barnamerizi Shahri. (In persian).
  18. Motalebi, Gh. (2002) Environmental Psychology: A new knowledge to serve in architecture and urban design. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 10 (0), 52-67. (in Persian).
  19. Newman, O. (1972).Defensible space: people and design in the violent city. London: Architectural press.
  20. Norberg-Schulz, Ch.(2002).The Concept of Dwelling: On the Way to Figurative Architecture. Yar Ahmadi, M. A. (translator). Tehran: Agah. (in Persian)
  21. Pakzad, J. (2007).An intellectual history of urbanism from quantity to quality.Tehran: Armanshahr.(in Persian).
  22. Rapoport, A.(2009). House Form and Culture, Afzalian,Kh. (Translator). First edition,Tehran: herfe honarmand. (in Persian).
  23. Relph, E. (1976).Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
  24. Stokoe, E. (2006).Public Intimacy in Neighbour Relationships and Complaints. Loughborough University: Sociological Research Online, 11(3).
  25. Talebi, zh. )2004).Social relations in urban spaces.Social Science Letter, 24 (24), 161-180. (in Persian).
  26. Tuan, Yi - Fu. (1977).Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  27. Turner, T. (1997). City as Landscape, Navirian.F. (Translator).Tehran:pardazesh va barnamerizi shahry co.
  28. Zarghami,E. (2010). The social sustainability principles of residential complexes in the Iranian Islamic cities. Motaleat shahri irani eslami, 1(2), 103-115. (in Persian