The Morphology of Qom; The Study on Spatial Configuration Changes of The City (1956-2021)

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Associate professor, Faculty of Architecture and Environmental design, Iran University of Science and Technology

2 PhD Candidate in urban planning & Design, Faculty of Architecture and Environmental design, Iran University of Science and Technology

Abstract

The present study attempts to investigate the relationship between spatial configuration changes of Qom and the central core in the last half century. The main objective of this study is to review the Spatial form of Qom, and analyze the effect of changes in Urban configuration on the central core of the city and the main axes of urban activities during 1946 to 2011 and ultimately, Forecast the future status of the city based on the extensive changes being conducted on the configuration of this religious metropolis in the time horizon of 2021. The findings of this study on the alignment of decisions made with regard to the Qom structure and the Holy Shrine of Fatima Masumeh (AS) as the Central core of the city in the last half century have identified two time periods. The first, Decisions adopted on developmental changes during 1946 to 2011, which weakened the Qom spatial Configuration Values. Second, Future developmental changes during 2011 to 2021 that are expected to lead to improvements in Spatial Configuration Values.
Based on Qom morphological analysis in the last half century, this study concludes if the Qom roadmap foreseen for the time horizon of 2021, including construction of ceremonial axis of Prophet (PBUH) boulevard, inner ring roads and completion of urban ring roads happens, then the improvement of global integration, synergy, intelligibility and Choice values in the Central core and other parts of the city are expected.

Keywords


  1. Census of Islamic Republic of Iran. (2016) "Qom census yearbook 2011". At <http://nnt.sci.org.ir/sites/apps/yearbook/year_book_doc/90-25-01.pdf> (accessed April. 19, 2017)
  2. Cuthbert, A. R. (2006) "The form of cities, Political economy and Urban design", Blackwell publishing. 
  3. Hanson, J. (1989) "Order and Structure in urban design: The plan for rebuilding of London after the great fire of 1666", Ekistics, 56, pp5-21.
  4. Harvey, D. (1973) ‘Social justice and the city’, Edward Arnold press.
  5. Hillier, B. (1997) "The Hidden Geometry of Deformed Grids: or, why space syntax works when it looks as though it shouldn't", Paper presented at the Space Syntax First International Symposium, London.
  6. Hillier, B. (2005) the art of place and the science of space. World architecture 11(185), pp. 96-102, at < http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1678/ >, (accessed April. 19, 2017).
  7. Hillier, B. (2007) "Space is the machine: The Hidden Geometry of Architecture", Ucl, At <http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/3881/1/SITM.pdf> (accessed April. 19, 2017).
  8. Hillier, B., et al. (1983) "Space syntax: A different Urban Perspective", The Architect Journal, 78, pp47-67.
  9. Hillier, B. & Hanson, J. (1984) "The social logic of space", Cambridge University Press.
  10.  Hillier, B. & Penn, A. (2004) Rejoinder to Carlo Ratti. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (4), pp501-511 at < http://epb.sagepub.com/content/31/4/501.short> (accessed April. 19, 2017).
  11. Hillier, B & Vaughan, L; (2007) The city as one thing. Progress in Planning, 67 (3), pp. 205-230, at< http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/3272/>, (accessed April. 19, 2017).
  12. Kubat, A. S. (1999) "The morphological history of Istanbul", Urban Morphology, 3:1, pp 28-41
  13.  Mohareb, N. & Kronenburg, R. (2012) Arab walled cities: investigating peripheral patterns in historic Cairo, Damascus, Alexandria, and Tripoli, Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium. At < www.sss8.cl/media/upload/paginas/seccion/8002_1.pdf > (accessed April. 19, 2017).
  14.  Penn, A. (2003) Space Syntax and spatial cognition or why the axial line? Environment and Behavior, 35 (1), pp 30-65, at < http://eab.sagepub.com/content/35/1/30.short >, (accessed April. 19, 2017).
  15.  Peponis, et al. (1989) "The spatial core of urban culture", Ekistics 56, pp 43-55.
  16.  Raford, N., Ragland, D. (2004) Space Syntax: an innovative pedestrian volume modeling tool for pedestrian safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1878, pp. 66-74, At <http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1878-09> (accessed April. 19, 2017)
  17.  Sa’adat, B. (1977) "The Holy Shrine of Imam Zadeh Fatima Ma'suma, Qum", Asia Institute, At <http://archnet.org/library/documents/one-document.jsp?document_id=9841> (accessed April. 19, 2017)
  18.  Soja, E. (2010) ‘Seeking Spatial Justice’ University of Minnesota Press.
  19.  Steadman, P. (2004) ‘Developments in space syntax’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, pp. 483-6.
  20.  Turner, A. (2007). "From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis", Environment and Planning B: planning and Design, 34:3, pp 539-555.
  21.  Zhang, L., Chiradia, A. and Zhuang, Y., (2013) "In the intelligibility maze of space syntax: A space syntax analysis of toy models, maze and labyrinths", proceedings of ninth international Space Syntax Symposium, Seoul. At <http://www.sss9.or.kr/paperpdf/scb/sss9_2013_ref082_p.pdf> (accessed April. 19, 2017).
  22.  Hillier, B., & Iida, S. (2005) "Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement", Paper presented at the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, University of Delft.