Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Development, Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU), Qazvin, Iran
As claimed by many behavioral scientists, designing should be based on the knowledge of interaction between human and environment. Environmental quality is also created in the context in which humans interact with their environment. To achieve such quality, designers should develop appropriate models for explaining this relationship, and this requires an understanding of human nature and the environment. Criticisms on the Modern Movement have shown that architects have often used incomplete and simplistic models in this regard, while most of design ideas are based on the definitions of human and environment and the interaction between them.
However, the most important question that is raised is that how understanding of human nature and the environment and their interaction, which depends on foundations of different views, can affect the pursuit of quality in designing?
Therefore, the present paper, in addition to introduction and comparison of common paradigms in humanities as the and methodological foundation of human sciences, aims to deal with the relationship of human and the environment from the perspective of objectivist, relativist, and critical paradigms in order to identify the characteristics and differences in their views on the analysis of the quality of this interaction. This is the most important step that paves the way for understanding the qualitative foundations of the environment and human life quality and also the quality of interaction between them.
1) Alipour, M., Hassani, S. H. R., 2011. Jurisprudential paradigm of religious knowledge; Qom, Institute of Seminary and University Research (in Persian).
2) Chalmers, A., 2011. The Nature of Science: An Introduction to philosophical scientology schools, translated by Zibakalam, S., Tehran, SAMT Publication.
3) Blaikie, N., 2012. Paradigms of research in humanities, translated by Hassani, S. H. R., Tehran, Institute of Seminary and University Research.
4) Eynifar, A. R., 2008. Evolution of human and environment theories and their role in development of basic knowledge of architecture, Journal of Andishenameh, Tehran, Center for the Study and Research of Planning and Architecture, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.
5) Groat, L., Wang, D., 2013. Research Methods in Architecture; translated by Eynifar. A. R., Tehran University Press.
6) Iman, M. T., 2008. Paradigmatic assessment of human as an essential element in the design of the divine paradigm, Journal of Humanities Methodology, vol. 14, no. 54, pp. 25-46.
7) Iman, M. T., 2011. Paradigmatic foundations of qualitative and quantitative research methods in the humanities. Tehran, Institute of Seminary and University Research (in Persian).
8) Lang, J., 2014. Creation of the theory of architecture; translated by Eynifar. A. R., Tehran University Press.
9) Mohammadpour, A., 2011. Method in method: about making knowledge in humanities, Tehran, Publication of Sociologists (in Persian)
10) Motallebi, G., 2001. Environmental Psychology: a new knowledge in the service of architecture and urban design, Journal of Fine Arts, Tehran University.
11) Pakzad, J., Bozorg, H., 2012. Alphabet of environmental psychology for designers; Tehran, Armanshahr Publication (in Persian).
12) Rapoport, A., 2012. Culture, architecture and design; translated by Barzegar, M. and Yousefnia, M., Sari, Shalfin Publication.
13) Razjouyan, M., 1996. An overview of coalition between architecture and behavioral sciences in the last half-century, Soffe Journal, no. 23, Shahid Beheshti University Press.
14) Sim, S. and Buryn, V., 2003. Critical theory; translated by Yazdanjoo, P., Tehran, Shirazeh Research and Publication.